Christopher J. Poronsky, Jingfang Qian Cutrone. Chromatoprobe as a sample-sparing technique for residual solvent analysis of drug discovery candidates by gas chromatography[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2017, 7(4): 265-269.
Citation:
Christopher J. Poronsky, Jingfang Qian Cutrone. Chromatoprobe as a sample-sparing technique for residual solvent analysis of drug discovery candidates by gas chromatography[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2017, 7(4): 265-269.
Christopher J. Poronsky, Jingfang Qian Cutrone. Chromatoprobe as a sample-sparing technique for residual solvent analysis of drug discovery candidates by gas chromatography[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2017, 7(4): 265-269.
Citation:
Christopher J. Poronsky, Jingfang Qian Cutrone. Chromatoprobe as a sample-sparing technique for residual solvent analysis of drug discovery candidates by gas chromatography[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2017, 7(4): 265-269.
In drug discovery research, residual solvent measurement is an integral part of purity analysis for synthesis of a drug candidate before it is used for toxicity testing. This is usually carried out using gas chromatography (GC) with direct injection sample introduction. This method requires testing compounds to be soluble at high concentrations ( > 50 mg/mL, usually in DMSO) to achieve acceptable sensitivity, a hurdle which is not always achievable for some samples such as cyclic peptides and oligonucleotides. To overcome the limitation associated with the direct injection approach, a new method using the Chromatoprobe thermal extraction device was developed for quantifying residual solvents of drug discovery compounds. This method not only consumes significantly less material (less than 1 mg), but also shows higher sensitivity than the direct injection approach. In addition, because no diluent is required with the Chromatoprobe thermal extraction, all residual solvents can be detected and measured without further method optimization. In our study, we compared data from GC residual solvent analysis using the Chromatoprobe solid sample introduction to those of the direct injection method for seven in-house samples. Our results showed a good agreement between the data from these two sample introduction methods. Thus, the Chromatoprobe sample introduction method provided a sample-sparing alternative to the direct injection method for the measurement of residual solvents in drug discovery. This method can be particularly useful for residual solvent analysis in samples that are available only in limited amounts, poorly soluble, and/or unstable in the diluents used for the direct injection method.
Reid, G.L.. Residual solvents. Specification of Drug Substances and Products: Development and Validation of Analytical Methods, Thrid Edition, 2024. doi:10.1016/B978-0-443-13466-1.00036-2
2.
Levine, Y., Chetrit, E., Fishman, Y. et al. A novel approach to plasticizer content calculation in an acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber real-time aging study (NBR). Polymer Testing, 2023, 124: 108091. doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.108091
3.
Varma, B.H.R., Rao, B.S. Gas Chromatography-Head Space-Mass Spectrometry Sensor based Quality Control of Dobutamine Hydrochloride Bulk Material for a mutagenic impurity, 2-bromopropane. Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment, 2023, 27(2): 54-61. doi:10.25303/2702rjce054061
4.
Vanderschaeghe, H., Houlleberghs, M., Verheyden, L. et al. Absolute Quantification of Residual Solvent in Mesoporous Silica Drug Formulations Using Magic-Angle Spinning NMR Spectroscopy. Analytical Chemistry, 2023, 95(3): 1880-1887. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.2c03646
5.
Bhupatiraju, R.V., Rao, B.S. Gas Chromatography-Head Space-Flame Ionization Sensor based assessment of four residuary solvents in rivaroxaban bulk medication. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 2022, 15(11): 5158-5163. doi:10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00868
6.
Arulraj, R.A., Gajjela, R., Chauthe, S.K. et al. High-Throughput GC-FID Method for the Determination of Residual Solvents in Early-Phase Drug Discovery Samples. Chromatographia, 2022, 85(6): 497-506. doi:10.1007/s10337-022-04157-9
7.
Djozan, D., Norouzi, J. Application of On-Line Sorbentless Cryogenic Needle Trap Extraction Coupled with GC-FID for Analysis of Some Organic Volatile Impurities in Solid Pharmaceuticals. Journal of Chromatographic Science, 2022, 60(4): 309-315. doi:10.1093/chromsci/bmab081
8.
Ignacz, G., Orkenyi, R., Konczol, A. et al. Sustainable separations in pharmaceutical manufacturing. Contemporary Chemical Approaches for Green and Sustainable Drugs, 2022. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-822248-5.00008-5
9.
Lu, Z., Lu, X., Xia, L. et al. Cobalt doped nitrogenous porous carbon derived from covalent organic framework as cataluminescence catalyst for rapid determination of n-hexane in edible oil. Talanta, 2021, 232: 122428. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122428
10.
Reid, G.L.. Residual solvents. Specification of Drug Substances and Products: Development and Validation of Analytical Methods, Second Edition, 2020. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102824-7.00013-0
11.
Qadah, D.T.D., Aldstadt, J.H. Determination of Aromatic Arsines in Environmental Solids by Direct Thermal Desorption Gas Chromatography. Analytical Letters, 2018, 51(9): 1321-1334. doi:10.1080/00032719.2017.1379531
Christopher J. Poronsky, Jingfang Qian Cutrone. Chromatoprobe as a sample-sparing technique for residual solvent analysis of drug discovery candidates by gas chromatography[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2017, 7(4): 265-269.
Christopher J. Poronsky, Jingfang Qian Cutrone. Chromatoprobe as a sample-sparing technique for residual solvent analysis of drug discovery candidates by gas chromatography[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2017, 7(4): 265-269.