Volume 11 Issue 3
Jun.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Seung-Hyun Jeong, Ji-Hun Jang, Hea-Young Cho, Yong-Bok Lee. Pharmacokinetic comparison with different assays for simultaneous determination of cis-, trans-cefprozil diastereomers in human plasma[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2021, 11(3): 351-363. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2020.07.001
Citation: Seung-Hyun Jeong, Ji-Hun Jang, Hea-Young Cho, Yong-Bok Lee. Pharmacokinetic comparison with different assays for simultaneous determination of cis-, trans-cefprozil diastereomers in human plasma[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2021, 11(3): 351-363. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2020.07.001

Pharmacokinetic comparison with different assays for simultaneous determination of cis-, trans-cefprozil diastereomers in human plasma

doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2020.07.001
  • Received Date: Feb. 28, 2020
  • Accepted Date: Jul. 01, 2020
  • Rev Recd Date: Jul. 01, 2020
  • Available Online: Jan. 24, 2022
  • Publish Date: Jun. 15, 2021
  • The purpose of this study was to compare pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters obtained using two newly developed assays, HPLC-UV and UPLC-ESI-MS/MS. Selection of assay and results obtained therefrom are very important in PK studies and can have a major impact on the PK-based clinical dose and usage settings. For this study, we developed two new methods that are most commonly used in biosample analysis and focused on PK parameters obtained from them. By HPLC-UV equipped with a Luna-C8 column using UV detector, cefprozil diastereomers were separated using water containing 2% (V/V) acetic acid and acetonitrile as a mobile phase. By UPLC-ESI-MS/MS equipped with a HALO-C18column, cefprozil diastereomers were separated using 0.5% (V/V) aqueous formic acid containing 5 mM ammonium-formate buffer and methanol as a mobile phase. Chromatograms showed high resolution, sensitivity, and selectivity without interference by plasma constituents. Both intra- and inter-day precisions (CV, %) were within 8.88% for HPLC-UV and UPLC-ESI-MS/MS. Accuracy of both methods was 95.67%–107.50%. These two analytical methods satisfied the criteria of international guidance and could be successfully applied to PK study. Comparison of PK parameters between two assays confirmed that there is a difference in the predicted minimum plasma concentrations at steady state, which may affect clinical dose and usage settings. Furthermore, we confirmed possible correlation between PK parameters and various biochemical parameters after oral administration of 1000 mg cefprozil to humans.
  • loading
  • G. Aronovitz, Treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections: clinical trials with cefprozil, Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 17 (1998) S83-S88
    W.C. Shyu, R. Wilber, K. Pittman, et al, Effect of antacid on the bioavailability of cefprozil, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36 (1992) 962-965
    L.R. Wiseman, P. Benfield, Cefprozil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential, Drugs 45 (1993) 295-317
    S. Bhargava, R. Lodha, S. Kabra, Cefprozil: A review, Indian J. Pediatr. 70 (2003) 395-400
    T.M. Nolen, Clinical trials of cefprozil for treatment of skin and skin-structure infections, Clin. Infect. Dis. 14 (1992) S253-S263
    T.-H. Park, J.-K. Kim, J.-P. Jee, et al, HPLC method for simultaneous determination of cefprozil diastereomers in human plasma, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 36 (2004) 243-248
    D. Gowrisankar, P.S. Sarsambi, S.A. Raju, Reverse phase-HPLC method for the analysis of cefprozil in pharmaceutical dosage forms, Int. J. Chem. Sci. 6 (2008) 1583-1589
    C. Ramesh, G.N. Reddy, T. Narayana, et al, Assay of cefprozil in bulk and its pharmacetical formulations by visible spectrophotometry, Rasayan J. Chem. 4 (2011) 13-16
    N.O. Can, HPLC determination of cefprozil in tablets using monolithic and C18 silica columns, J. Sep. Sci. 34 (2011) 2223-2231
    P.R.M. Reddy, J. Sreeramulu, P.Y. Naidu, et al, Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for estimation of impurities of cefprozil in its powder for oral suspension dosage form using sub 2-μm column, Asian J. Res. Chem. 4 (2011) 810-814
    W.C. Shyu, U.A. Shukla, V.R. Shah, et al, Simultaneous high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of cefprozil diastereomers in a pharmacokinetic study, Pharm. Res. 8 (1991) 992-996
    H. Song, G. Yuan, C. Wei, et al, HPLC method for pharmacokinetics of cis and trans isomer of cefprozil diastereomers in human plasma, IOSR J. Pharm. 2 (2012) 257-264
    Y.-b. He, C.-x. Zhang, X.-f. Pan, et al, Determination of cefprozil in human plasma using high performance liquid chromatography and its application to bioequivalence study, Lat. Am. J. Pharm. 33 (2014) 288-293
    M. Liu, J.Y. Ma, Y. Zhang, et al, An LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of cefprozil diastereomers in human plasma and its application for the bioequivalence study of two cefprozil tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers, Biomed. Chromatogr. 30 (2016) 288-293
    G. He, L. Mai, X. Wang, Development and validation of an HPLC-MS/MS method for rapid simultaneous determination of cefprozil diastereomers in human plasma, Int. J. Anal. Chem. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6959761
    C. Georgita, I. Sora, F. Albu, et al, Comparison of a LC/MS method with a LC/UV method for the determination of metformin in plasma samples, Farmacia 58 (2010) 158-169
    O. Roth, O. Spreux-Varoquaux, S. Bouchet, et al, Imatinib assay by HPLC with photodiode-array UV detection in plasma from patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: Comparison with LC-MS/MS, Clin. Chim. Acta 411 (2010) 140-146
    J. Tuerk, M. Reinders, D. Dreyer, et al, Analysis of antibiotics in urine and wipe samples from environmental and biological monitoring-comparison of HPLC with UV-, single MS-and tandem MS-detection, J. Chromatogr. B 831 (2006) 72-80
    S.F. Baldrey, R.R. Brodie, G.R. Morris, et al, Comparison of LC-UV and LC-MS-MS for the determination of taxol, Chromatographia 55 (2002) S187-S192
    D. Bedor, T. Goncalves, M. Ferreira, et al, Simultaneous determination of sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim in biological fluids for high-throughput analysis: comparison of HPLC with ultraviolet and tandem mass spectrometric detection, J. Chromatogr. B 863 (2008) 46-54
    B.C. Sallustio, B.D. Noll, R.G. Morris, Comparison of blood sirolimus, tacrolimus and everolimus concentrations measured by LC-MS/MS, HPLC-UV and immunoassay methods, Clin. Biochem. 44 (2011) 231-236
    V. Weingerl, M. Strlic, D. Kocar, Comparison of methods for determination of polyphenols in wine by HPLC-UV/VIS, LC/MS/MS and spectrophotometry, Acta Chim. Slov. 56 (2009) 698-703
    J.-H. Jang, S.-H. Jeong, H.-Y. Cho, et al, Comparison of UPLC-MS/MS and HPLC-UV methods for the determination of zaltoprofen in human plasma, J. Pharm. Investig. 49 (2019) 613-624
    FDA, Bioanalytical Method Validation Gudiance for Industry, in, US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM), Rockville, MD, 2018
    M.E.-A. Sobhy, M.S. Hanaa, Spectrometric investigation of cefprozil in bulk powder and in pharmaceutical formulations, Sci. Pharm. 70 (2002) 67-76
    A. Suneetha, R.K. Raja, Comparison of LC-UV and LC-MS methods for simultaneous determination of teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate and fampridine in human plasma: application to rat pharmacokinetic study, Biomed. Chromatogr. 30 (2016) 1371-1377
    M.I. Churchwell, N.C. Twaddle, L.R. Meeker, et al, Improving LC-MS sensitivity through increases in chromatographic performance: Comparisons of UPLC-ES/MS/MS to HPLC-ES/MS/MS, J. Chromatogr. B 825 (2005) 134-143
    J.-H. Jang, S.-H. Jeong, H.-Y. Cho, et al, Population pharmacokinetics of cis-, trans-, and total cefprozil in healthy male Koreans, Pharmaceutics (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11100531
    W.C. Shyu, K. Pittman, R. Wilber, et al, Pharmacokinetics of cefprozil in healthy subjects and patients with renal impairment, J. Clin. Pharmacol. 31 (1991) 362-371
    S.L. Barriere, Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of cefprozil, Clin. Infect. Dis. 14 (1992) S184-S188
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (82) PDF downloads(5) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return